{"id":173,"date":"2009-12-16T19:07:25","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T00:07:25","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/?p=173"},"modified":"2009-12-16T17:07:41","modified_gmt":"2009-12-16T22:07:41","slug":"weve-found-earth-episode-9","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/?p=173","title":{"rendered":"We&#8217;ve found Earth episode 9"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m about to walk down the well-worn path of critiquing science coverage in the traditional media, but here we are.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.time.com\/time\/health\/article\/0,8599,1947868,00.html?cnn=yes\">Super-Earth: Newly Discovered Planet May Have Water &#8211; TIME<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Or more accurately &#8211; it *is* water.  Every exoplanet report that reaches the traditional media tends to be exaggerated to feed the desire for an exciting story, and I think the net result is that the typical dispassionate observer may have concluded several times by now that earth like planets have been found.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 For example, the findings that Gliese 581d and e may or may not be in the &#8216;habitable zone&#8217; of their star triggered similar earth-like stories.\u00a0\u00a0 Now this new discovery of a 6.5 Earth mass ball of hot ice is throwing similar keywords.<\/p>\n<p>However my favorite part of the article is this:<\/p>\n<p>&lt;blockquote&gt;a planet 2.7 times bigger than Earth, circling a dim red star called GJ 1214, just 40 light-years away in the constellation Ophiuchus.&lt;\/blockquote&gt;<\/p>\n<p>Yes, it&#8217;s *only* 40 light-years away, we can just stroll over there.\u00a0 And how to decide whether to use the mass or radius when reporting how much &#8220;bigger&#8221; it is?\u00a0 Let&#8217;s use the smaller number to increase the earth-like excitement!<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I can&#8217;t believe I&#8217;m about to walk down the well-worn path of critiquing science coverage in the traditional media, but here we are. Super-Earth: Newly Discovered Planet May Have Water &#8211; TIME. Or more accurately &#8211; it *is* water. Every exoplanet report that reaches the traditional media tends to be exaggerated to feed the desire [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[13,3],"tags":[45],"class_list":["post-173","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-media","category-space","tag-exoplanets"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=173"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":176,"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/173\/revisions\/176"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=173"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=173"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"http:\/\/www.ryanburns.net\/blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=173"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}